sp; Steiner,Scripts people live,chapters 6-12. 注二: Woollams,S.,‘Cure!?'TAJ,10,2,1980,115-7. 注三: Berne, What do you say...,chapters 14,17.For other views on the physiological aspects of script.还可以参考: Cassius,J.,Body scripts.Memphis:Cassius,1975. Lenhardt,V.,‘Bioscripts'.In:Stern(ed.),TA:the state of the art,chapter 8.
第12章
注一:关于心理地位,可以参考: Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 12. Berne,What do you say...,chapter 5. Berne,E.,‘Classification of positions'.Transactional Analysis Bulletin,1,3,1962,23. James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 2. Steiner,Scripts people live,chapter 5. 注二:Ernst,F.,‘The OK corral:the grid for get-on-with'.TAJ,1,4,1971,231-40. In agreeing that we use his Corral diagram in this book,Franklin Ernst asked that we give it his revised subtitle‘Grid for what's happening',as in Figure 12.1. 注三:Ernst,F.,‘The annual Eric Berne memorial scientific award acceptance speech'.TAJ,12,1,1982, 5-8.
第13章
注一:关于脚本讯息及其传递的方式,请参考: Berne,What do you say...,chapter 7. English,F.,‘What shall I do tomorrow? Reconceptualizing transactional analysis',in: Barnes (ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter15. Steiner,Scripts people live, chapter 6. White,J.,and White,T.,‘Cultural scripting'.TAJ,5,1,1975,12- 25. Woollams,S.,‘From 21 to 43'.In: Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 16. 注二:Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 5. 注三:Steiner,C.,‘Script and counterscript'.TAB,5,18,1966,133-35.关于脚本图的其他说法,还可以参考: Berne,What do you say...,chapter 15. English,F.,‘Sleepy, spunky and spooky'.TAJ,2,2,1972,64-7. English.F.,参考本章注一同一作者资料。 Holloway,W.,‘Transactional analysis an integrative view'.In:Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 11. James(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...,chapter 4. Woollams,S.,参考本章注一同一作者的资料。 Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 9.
第14章
注一: Goulding,R.,and Goulding,M.,‘New directions in transactional analysis'.In Sager and Kaptan (eds.),Progress in group and family therapy.NewYork:Brunner/Mazel,1972,105-34. Goulding,R.,and Goulding,M.,‘Injunctions, decisions and redecisions'.TAJ,6,1,1976,41-8. Goulding,R.,and Goulding,M.,The power is in the patient.San Francisco:TA press.1978.(本书第5章和第16章就是取自前面两篇文章。) Gouldings,Changing lives through redecision therapy,chapters 2,9.(国内译本名为《再生之旅——藉再决定治疗改变一生》,心理出版社出版) Allen,J.,and Allen,B.,‘Scripts: the role of permission'.TAJ,2,2,1972,72-4. 注二: English,F.,‘Episcript and the"hot potato" game'.TAB,8,32,1969,77-82. 注三: Berne,What do you say...,chapter 7. 注四:正式的脚本问卷有好几种,请参考: Berne,What do you say...,chapter 23. Holloway,W.,Clinical transactional analysis with use of the life script questionnaire.Aptos: Holloway,undated. James(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...chapter 4. McCormick,P.,Guide for use of a life-script questionnaire in transactional analysis.San Francisco:Transactional Publications,1971. McCormick,P.,‘Taking Occam's Razor to the life-script interview'.Keynote speeches delivered at the EATA conference,July 1986.Geneva: EATA,1987,speech 5. Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 9.
第15章
注一: Berne,Sex in human loving,chapter 5. Berne,What do you say...chapter .11. 注二: Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapters 60-65.
第16章
注一:Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapter 72。也可参考: Kahler,T.,and Capers.H.,‘The miniscripf.'TAJ,4,1,1974,26-42.请注意前者是后者的修改版本。 注二: Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapters 60-65 and accompanying Summary. 也可参考Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 11。请注意Woollams和Brown所谈对驱力和脚本的关系,与Kahler的看法不同。 Kahler认为“要坚强”这个驱力和“永不”脚本有关,而“努力试”和“总是”脚本有关。Woollams和Brown的看法刚好相反。 注三:Kahler.T.,‘The miniscript',出处同本章注一。 Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapters 68-71. 注四: Kahler,T.,workshop presentation, EATA conference, Villars, 1984, unpublished. 注五: Capers,H.,and Goodman,L.,‘The survival process: clarification of the miniscript'.TAJ,13, 1, 1983,142-8. 注六:Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapters 73-75 and 78-83。也可参考Kahler and Capers,‘The miniscript',出处同本章注一。前者是后者的修改版本。本书引用的内容是凯乐修改后的版本,但是位置二的“禁止者”是用修改前的版本,凯乐在修订版把“禁止者”改成位置三,以“顺从不良者”当位置二。 注七: Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapter 85. 注一: Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader,chapter 2.也可参考: Mellor,K.,and Sigmund,E.,‘Discounting'.TAJ,5,3,1975,295-302. Schiff,A.,and Schiff,J.,‘Passivity’TAJ,1,1,1971,71-8. 注二:漠视的这个定义是由席芙在一次工作坊时提出的(未出版),我们认为比《Cathexis reader》一书第14章所提出的定义“漠视是一种内在心理机转,包括轻看或忽略关于自己、他人、现实状况的某些面向”更容易了解。 史坦能在《Scripts people Live》一书第9章提出另一种定义:“一种交错的交流,受到漠视的人由成人自我发出刺激指向对方的成人自我,可是对方却由父母自我或儿童自我做反应。”乍看之下,史坦能对漠视的定义似乎比席芙更广泛,可是从史坦能所举的例子却可以看出,他所指的情形,其实也是指对方(从父母自我或儿童自我做反应的那一方)“轻看或忽略”别人的某些面向。
第18章
注一:Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader chapter 2.也可参考: Mellor,K.,and Sigmund,E.,‘Discounting,'TAJ,5,3.1975,295-302.
第19章
注一:Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader chapter 5也可参考: Mellor,K.,and Sigmund,E.,‘Redefining'.TAJ,5,3,1975,303-11. 注二:这里关于“再定义”的意义,是经由本书作者的解释,我们认为这比《Cathexis reader》书中的定义更清楚而直接。
第20章
注一:Schiff et el.,Cathexis reader,chapter 2,我们更改了席芙定义中的一个字,以“一个人”(single person)代替“整个人”(whole person)。请参考Schiff,A.,and Schiff.J.,‘Passivity'.TAJ,1,1,1971,71-8. 共生图有好几种画法,一九七一年席芙夫妇登在TA期刊的文章,只用虚线和实线的圆圈表示自我状态的界限。在《Cathexis reader》一书,他们又在双方产生互动的自我状态间加上箭号。现在常用的圆形就像图20-1,把产生互助的自我状态圈在一起,则是Woollams和Huige在本章注二里的文章提出的。 注二:Woollams,S.,and Huige,K.,‘Normal dependency and symbiosis'.TAJ,7,3,1977,217-20. 注三: Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader,chapter 4. Schiff,S.,‘Personality development and symbiosis'.TAJ,7,4,1977,310-6.
第21章
注一:关于扭曲的本质和作用,请参考: Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 13. Berne,What do you say...,chapter 8.